Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

From: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Date: 2016-09-11 14:26:25
Message-ID: CAPfS4ZxCYq03-6YHLE7xOJ0kUWzZ0T7dEou=Ygo+a1aJ-WHkxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> P.S. I'm asking because I was planning to review that patch. But I
>> can't tell if any more review by a non-committer is still required by
>> the commitfest workflow.
>
>
> I think this has gotten enough attention, for the commitfest workflow. The
> workflow is flexible, depending on the nature of patch. But of course, if
> you're interested, feel free to review and comment anyway!

Hi Heikki,

Thanks for the help. If you think nothing more is needed for this
patch set w.r.t. the 2016-09 commitfest, I'll move on to other things.

- Christian

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-11 14:32:04 Re: Duplicate data despite unique constraint
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-09-11 14:12:14 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-11 14:34:57 Re: [PATCH] Alter or rename enum value
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-09-11 14:12:14 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres