From: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
Date: | 2016-09-11 14:26:25 |
Message-ID: | CAPfS4ZxCYq03-6YHLE7xOJ0kUWzZ0T7dEou=Ygo+a1aJ-WHkxg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> P.S. I'm asking because I was planning to review that patch. But I
>> can't tell if any more review by a non-committer is still required by
>> the commitfest workflow.
>
>
> I think this has gotten enough attention, for the commitfest workflow. The
> workflow is flexible, depending on the nature of patch. But of course, if
> you're interested, feel free to review and comment anyway!
Hi Heikki,
Thanks for the help. If you think nothing more is needed for this
patch set w.r.t. the 2016-09 commitfest, I'll move on to other things.
- Christian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-11 14:32:04 | Re: Duplicate data despite unique constraint |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-09-11 14:12:14 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-11 14:34:57 | Re: [PATCH] Alter or rename enum value |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-09-11 14:12:14 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |