Re: segfault with plproxy

From: Filip Rembiałkowski <filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segfault with plproxy
Date: 2011-12-20 16:59:13
Message-ID: CAP_rwwk0QT5c0OpQDx4ncRZZP+obyzxmrFD6vXAimymZN-fAJA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

W dniu 20 grudnia 2011 15:36 użytkownik Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> napisał:

>> Is schema a part of function signature?
>
> Yes.

Thanks again, that explains everything.

In the meantime, depesz has a solution basing on application_name, not
on username+schema as I tried.

http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2011/12/02/the-secret-ingredient-in-the-webscale-sauce/
- "many shards within the same database".

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jkells 2011-12-20 17:32:58 General coding question
Previous Message Mike Blackwell 2011-12-20 16:06:44 Re: How To Handle Hung Connections