From: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with aborting entire transactions on error |
Date: | 2012-12-11 11:47:52 |
Message-ID: | CAPTjJmrmTfyjEXTa63KUGRHVnVtATuwuBWFytgcJ-srug4Fbwg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Zbigniew <zbigniew2011(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There are always TWO sides (at least two): creators/designers - and
> the users. Considering how much complexity some kind of modification
> adds to your - programmer's - code, and how it'll make your life more
> difficult, at the same time try to consider, how much relief could it
> mean to many of the users of your software.
I have considered. It will be beneficial to a small group of users,
including yourself; I predict it will have significant costs
(performance, documentation complexity, etc) for all users. (Of
course, my prediction is decidedly non-authoritative. But I had to
deal with the docs complexity of issues like the autocommit that Tom
Lane mentioned; it's definitely a cost.)
ChrisA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zbigniew | 2012-12-11 11:48:29 | Re: Problem with aborting entire transactions on error |
Previous Message | Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda | 2012-12-11 11:44:11 | Re: Problem with aborting entire transactions on error |