Re: Libpq question

From: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Libpq question
Date: 2012-05-16 15:49:49
Message-ID: CAPTjJmr5Y11HQ+qfDT1YU-EnPbww87nBTDCojnZ1rRBzkXYxBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:21 AM, John Townsend
<jtownsend(at)advancedformulas(dot)com> wrote:
> *** So...the question: Is there a good reason why you might want to NOT use
> libpq.dll, and just directly access the server through direct function
> calls? ***

I don't know what you mean by function calls, but the Pike Postgres
module directly speaks and interprets the socket protocol. It's faster
than having an extra layer in there.

http://pike.ida.liu.se/generated/manual/modref/ex/predef_3A_3A/Sql/pgsql.html

ChrisA

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2012-05-16 15:52:24 Re: Libpq question
Previous Message deepak 2012-05-16 15:34:52 Re: FATAL: lock file "postmaster.pid" already exists