From: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux Distribution Preferences? |
Date: | 2013-01-14 00:37:21 |
Message-ID: | CAPTjJmoajDodrjw8uvr+nSy9QLDU9EtBbSLd+7Zy6L0909iX+Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Chris Ernst <cernst(at)zvelo(dot)com> wrote:
> I've seen the opinion of "avoid Ubuntu like the plague" expressed many
> times, but it is never followed up with any solid reasoning. Can you (or
> anyone else) give specific details on exactly why you believe Ubuntu should
> be avoided?
I switched from Ubuntu to Debian a while ago, mainly on account of the
desktop environment, but moving servers as well for consistency.
Ubuntu has its advantages. At the moment, I'm half way through
patching a Debian system to the latest kernel and a recent Upstart
(rather than sysvinit), but Ubuntu already comes with a fairly recent
kernel and Upstart is the default.
So far, I haven't seen any particular reason to detest Ubuntu or
Debian. Both of them quite happily run everything I want, although
once it's been a year or two since the OS release, there's a strong
tendency to build stuff from source rather than rely on the aptitude
repositories - the repos lag a bit. But I'm okay with that. Maybe it's
an issue for other situations, though, in which case it's a
recommendation for Ubuntu probably.
In terms of PostgreSQL, I've always been using the OpenSCG package,
and have had no problems whatsoever (9.1).
ChrisA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2013-01-14 00:48:10 | Re: Linux Distribution Preferences? |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2013-01-14 00:34:43 | Re: VALUES() evaluation order |