| From: | Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Publish artifacts to Maven central |
| Date: | 2013-04-04 22:35:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAPPfruxNtMjmQTiteY_1sr1h4dDPiKkWMMLo9s2F_fwBEPHxGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 5 April 2013 01:52, Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2013 13:12, "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > However it appears maven forces
> >
> > org/postgresql/postgresql/postgresql-JDBC4-1002.jar
> >
>
> From a Maven developers point of view they're not worried about the
> directory structure as they just specify group id, artifact id and version
> in the pom.xml. So you just need to come up with reasonable parameters for
> each of those.
>
The existing artefacts in maven central have a group id of "postgresql",
an artefact id of "postgresql" and a version format of "9.1-901-1.jdbc4".
See e.g.
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22postgresql%22%20AND%20a%3A%22postgresql%22
Is there a particular reason to change the all of that at this point? I
know I personally would probably have made the group "org.postgresql" and
the artefact id "jdbc-driver" and maybe specified the jdbc version as a
classifier (although some build systems are a bit funny about classifiers).
But people have been using the existing group and artefact id, so I don't
see much point changing it now.
Cheers
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2013-04-05 19:03:20 | Re: Publish artifacts to Maven central |
| Previous Message | Stephen Nelson | 2013-04-04 15:22:24 | Re: Publish artifacts to Maven central |