Re: Postgres jdbc build broken with plain ant since e7c2c93

From: Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres jdbc build broken with plain ant since e7c2c93
Date: 2014-04-23 02:36:22
Message-ID: CAPPfrux5WfHKe+WG9q4x+OgBjD03=chR46P1snUfXWTK_84ZbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 22 April 2014 05:54, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But is not actually the version of ant, because if I download 1.7.1 from
> apache and run it as above, that works as well. It seems to be something
> that the distributions have done. The distributions I tested where
> CentOS6.5
> and Amazon Linux AMI 2014.03.1 - ami-fb8e9292 (64-bit).

Could be this: https://ant.apache.org/faq.html#InstantiationException

Is there an /etc/ant.conf file?

> Since it isn't the ant version problem, I don't know what could be added to
> the README to help people.

The docco could say something like "if you have ant installed via a
linux distribution package, you should either use that version or call
the version that you wish to use with the --noconfig option"

Cheers

Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2014-04-23 14:56:00 Re: About binaryTransfer.
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-04-21 20:24:25 Re: Postgres jdbc build broken with plain ant since e7c2c93