| From: | Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reading and writing off-heap data |
| Date: | 2017-09-25 08:04:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAPPfruw9cUS1myH3gakRpOizW=FMte+GNcibbgNOYj6og0TbRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
(Sorry, re-sending from address that is subscribed to the list)
On 22 September 2017 at 01:01, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Is there general support for the feature? I'm again happy to code up a PR
>> and have time allocated to do that fairly soon if there's likelihood of it
>> being merged.
>>
>> I would think so , however as noted on the PR I'd like to see some timing
> of the Tuple code. I don't expect it would be heinous but one never knows.
>
Currently it's a very thin wrapper around the array and construction in
most places is still just filling that array and the constructing the
wrapper once that's done, so I do expect almost zero change. I'll try to
quantify it though. Do we have any existing test for these sorts of things?
If not I'll just generate a bunch of data and pull it through - seems easy
enough.
Thanks
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2017-09-25 08:06:01 | Re: Reading and writing off-heap data |
| Previous Message | Genya | 2017-09-25 07:20:07 | Re: [JDBC] Timestamp parameter gets sent as date |