Thanks much Rui and All for the valuable inputs. Rui's suggested solution
would be sufficient for our audit requirement.
Thank you,
Vipin
On Sat, May 8, 2021, 7:59 PM Rui DeSousa <rui(at)crazybean(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> > On May 8, 2021, at 8:55 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem with this scheme is that any role with SUPERUSER privs can
> modify that table.
> >
>
> True; and if that is a concern then audit the table from a different
> system where those superusers do not have access to.
>
>
>
>