From: | David Emmerson <dave(at)gearset(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Copy paste error |
Date: | 2025-02-14 11:50:14 |
Message-ID: | CAPO3XQy6qxSkz6G7qcnOkbMaP_jk_Y6y1V3iy-MUSLNLQyKLqg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Man... I looked at it 50 times before I posted that report. Sorry!
Totally correct. Nothing to see here.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 14:49, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 7:44 AM PG Doc comments form <
> noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/multivariate-statistics-examples.html
>> Description:
>>
>> CREATE STATISTICS stts (dependencies) ON a, b FROM t;
>> ANALYZE t;
>> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, TIMING OFF) SELECT * FROM t WHERE a = 1 AND b = 1;
>> QUERY PLAN
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Seq Scan on t (cost=0.00..195.00 rows=100 width=8) (actual rows=100
>> loops=1)
>> Filter: ((a = 1) AND (b = 1))
>> Rows Removed by Filter: 9900
>>
>>
>> The result of the explain is a copy paste of previous example, so this
>> example looks like the statistic doesn't improve things
>>
>
> Look more closely, and read the surrounding text. It talks about the
> problem being the rows estimate.
>
> David J.
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-02-14 15:20:15 | Re: Minor suggestions for docs regarding json_table |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2025-02-14 08:00:20 | Re: Minor suggestions for docs regarding json_table |