From: | Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <smmujeeb2001(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Issue in compiling postgres on latest macOS 14.1.1 |
Date: | 2023-11-13 16:19:33 |
Message-ID: | CAPMpM21+9_h0okjCD=c4qySs8SJuS7rpsiyS6_ZbW+HEau0qWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom Lane,
Sorry for not providing the context properly in the previous mail. I have
recently updated to macOS 14.1.1 and tried to compile postgres. I have
mentioned the steps I had followed and the output of those steps in the
attached file. I am getting the same error during build time for all the
branches [ REL_14_STABLE, REL_15_STABLE, master, etc,. ]. Please note that
the same steps were working fine, when I was in macOS 13.
Please let me know if any other information is required.
Thanks & Regards,
Mujeeb.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 9:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <smmujeeb2001(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > After updating to macOS 14.1.1, I am facing below error while compiling
> > postgres. Can someone help me in solving this?
>
> > ld: multiple errors: archive member '/' not a mach-o file in
> > '/src/port/libpgport.a'; archive member '/' not a mach-o file in
> > '/src/common/libpgcommon.a'
>
> Hmm. I kind of wonder if you are doing something odd like trying
> to build in a directory path whose name contains spaces. We aren't
> terribly clean about weird path names at build time.
>
> Beyond that, you've given exactly zero context that would help
> anyone else in understanding or duplicating the problem.
> "It doesn't work on macOS 14.1.1" is not useful, because that
> works fine for me and a number of other people.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
steps_followed.txt | text/plain | 241.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-11-13 16:23:57 | Re: Is "WITH RECURSIVE" limited to the first position of CTEs by design? |
Previous Message | Kirk Wolak | 2023-11-13 16:17:00 | Is "WITH RECURSIVE" limited to the first position of CTEs by design? |