Re: pg_restore depending on user functions

From: Дмитрий Иванов <firstdismay(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore depending on user functions
Date: 2021-11-15 16:36:14
Message-ID: CAPL5KHrS035SSpnMGmFETgLpROvQybM+WnfMwtTpCQ7k8WUwmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

Yes, it is.
I'll leave behind the lost features, views, table definitions, and
dependent objects. It will take some time.
thanks, for the help.

пн, 15 нояб. 2021 г. в 20:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> =?UTF-8?B?0JTQvNC40YLRgNC40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy?= <firstdismay(at)gmail(dot)com>
> writes:
> > Is it ok to attach a 5MB data schema or is it not possible? Copy one by
> one
> > to a letter?
>
> Is it smaller if you omit the data (-s switch)? Shouldn't be relevant
> here.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kishore Isaac 2021-11-15 20:59:41 RE: Tenable Report Issue even after upgrading to correct Postgres version
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-11-15 16:06:03 Re: Bogus NULL object_name from pg_event_trigger_dropped_objects()

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Дмитрий Иванов 2021-11-15 21:24:31 Re: pg_restore depending on user functions
Previous Message Дмитрий Иванов 2021-11-15 16:03:42 Re: pg_restore depending on user functions