Re: pg_restore depending on user functions

Thanks for the feedback!
Is it ok to attach a 5MB data schema or is it not possible? Copy one by one
to a letter?
It would be nice if in the end I could rebuild the base without hindrance.
Thank you in advance.
Restore Windows 10 PostgreSQL 12.9, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914,
64-bit -> Debian 11 PostgreSQL 14.1 (Debian 14.1-1.pgdg110+1) on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110,
64-bit

sudo /usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/pg_dump --file
"/home/dismay/uchet/Uchet.backup" --host "server" --port "5999" --username
"back" --no-password --verbose --format=c --quote-all-identifiers --blobs
--column-inserts --inserts --create --disable-triggers --encoding="UTF8"
"Uchet"
no error/

Drop base

CREATE DATABASE "Uchet"
WITH
OWNER = funcowner
TEMPLATE = template0
ENCODING = 'UTF8'
LC_COLLATE = 'ru_RU.UTF-8'
LC_CTYPE = 'ru_RU.UTF-8'
CONNECTION LIMIT = -1;
SET check_function_bodies = false;

sudo /usr/lib/postgresql/14/bin/pg_restore --host "127.0.0.1" --port "5432"
--username "back" --no-password --dbname "Uchet" --disable-triggers
--format=c --create --verbose "/home/dismay/uchet/Uchet.backup"
error:
"bpd"."class_prop_user_smal_val" error syntax money
"bpd"."class_prop_user_small_val_snapshot" error syntax money
"bpd"."object error insert column is_inside"
ignored error 26603

visible differences
base source base receiver
count function 711 649
count views 125 117
count rows bpd.object 25769 0
count rows bpd.class_prop_user_small_val 28295 28182
count rows bpd.class_prop_user_small_val_snapshot 33550 33491

lost views:
"int_class_ext"
"int_doc_category_ext"
"int_doc_file_ext"
"int_doc_link_ext"
"int_object_ext"
"vclass_ext"
"vdocument_ext"
"vobject_general_ext"

lost function:
"class_act_base_ext_allowed_by_id_group"
"class_act_ext_allowed_rl1_by_id_position"
"class_act_ext_by_id"
"class_act_ext_by_id_conception_msk_name"
"class_act_ext_by_id_global_prop"
"class_act_ext_by_id_group"
"class_act_ext_by_id_group_msk_name"
"class_act_ext_by_id_parent"
"class_act_ext_by_id_parent_msk_name"
"class_act_ext_by_id_parent_strict_name"
"class_act_ext_by_msk_global_prop"
"class_act_ext_by_msk_global_prop_from_class"
"class_act_ext_by_msk_global_prop_from_group"
"class_act_real_ext_allowed_by_id_group"
"class_act_real_ext_by_id_group"
"class_snapshot_base_ext_by_id_position"
"class_snapshot_ext_by_id"
"class_snapshot_ext_by_id_class"
"class_snapshot_ext_by_id_parent_snapshot"
"class_snapshot_ext_on_object_by_id_parent_snapshot_parent_pos"
"document_ext_by_id"
"document_ext_by_id_category"
"document_ext_by_id_class_prop"
"document_ext_by_id_conception"
"document_ext_by_id_group"
"document_ext_by_id_object"
"document_ext_by_id_object_prop"
"document_ext_by_id_parent"
"document_ext_by_id_pos_temp"
"document_ext_by_id_pos_temp_prop"
"document_ext_by_id_position"
"document_ext_by_id_position_prop"
"document_ext_by_id_user"
"document_ext_by_msk_name_from_category"
"document_ext_by_msk_name_from_conception"
"int_class_ext_prop_by_id_class_array"
"int_object_ext_prop_by_id_object_array"
"object_carrier_ext_by_object_class_full"
"object_ext_by_id"
"object_ext_by_id_class_act"
"object_ext_by_id_class_full"
"object_ext_by_id_class_id_pos"
"object_ext_by_id_class_root"
"object_ext_by_id_class_snapshot"
"object_ext_by_id_class_snapshot_id_pos"
"object_ext_by_id_group"
"object_ext_by_id_group_root"
"object_ext_by_id_object_carrier"
"object_ext_by_id_position"
"object_ext_by_id_position_full"
"object_ext_by_id_prop_data_type"
"object_ext_by_id_prop_enum"
"object_ext_by_id_prop_enum_val"
"object_ext_by_id_unit_conversion_rule"
"object_ext_by_link_object"
"object_ext_by_msk_global_prop"
"object_ext_by_msk_global_prop_from_pos"
"object_ext_by_name"
"object_ext_by_name_id_pos"
"object_ext_carrier_by_msk_global_prop"
"object_object_prop_by_id_object_carrier_ext"
"object_object_prop_by_id_position_carrier_ext"

пн, 15 нояб. 2021 г. в 05:06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> =?UTF-8?B?0JTQvNC40YLRgNC40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy?= <firstdismay(at)gmail(dot)com>
> writes:
> > вс, 14 нояб. 2021 г. в 23:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> >> This is not "details", this is an evidence-free assertion. Please show
> >> a concrete example of problematic functions.
>
> > Ok, I'll do it.
> > [ example ]
>
> This is pretty far from being a self-contained example; I had to guess
> at the definitions of several types that you didn't provide. Having
> done so, though, the set of functions and types seem to dump and restore
> just fine. So I still don't see any problem here.
>
> Possibly worth noting is that pg_dump is careful to include this in
> its output script:
>
> SET check_function_bodies = false;
>
> Without that, I can believe that you'd have some trouble restoring
> these functions, since pg_dump doesn't know anything about the
> cross-references appearing in the function bodies. But with that,
> there don't appear to be any troublesome cross-references here.
>
> regards, tom lane
>