From: | Gideon Dresdner <gideond(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: can't coax query planner into using all columns of a gist index |
Date: | 2015-08-12 15:07:29 |
Message-ID: | CAPGvaSPwWsqfJpN8Gdr1DtR3O=TTFRhJV=Yu+fDCNe=44geYog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What's a good way for me to create a self-contained test case. AFAIU the
only way to make these test cases more self-contained would be to inline
the second table and its index. How do you create an index to an inlined
table of values?
Or perhaps I could send over a dump of a subset of the data?
Yes, I am fairly sure that I am running 9.4.4:
$ psql --version
psql (PostgreSQL) 9.4.4
# select version();
version
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 9.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 5.1.0,
64-bit
(1 row)
Thanks for the help,
Gideon.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:23 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gideon Dresdner <gideond(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I had a discussion on IRC today with RhodiumToad regarding optimizing a
> > specific query. We didn't manage to figure out how to get postgres to
> hit a
> > GIST index.
>
> FWIW, I couldn't reproduce the described behavior. Can you provide a
> self-contained test case? Are you sure your server is 9.4.4?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-08-12 15:37:39 | Re: fix oversight converting buf_id to Buffer |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-08-12 14:50:32 | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |