Re: permission denied to create extension "ltree" Must be superuser to create this extension.

From: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)the00z(dot)org>
To: "krzf83(at)gmail(dot)com" <krzf83(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: permission denied to create extension "ltree" Must be superuser to create this extension.
Date: 2012-03-15 05:45:18
Message-ID: CAPD=2Ni2a_ZBYUGxyY=9JrF2cYOgaP1Juj+hddVA2cTeMVMbZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:28 PM, krzf83(at)gmail(dot)com <krzf83(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok, but can someone comment, document something on security of
> installing extensions for normal users? Does allowing access to
> extension provides a way to circumvent security model? If not why
> can't it be allowed for user installations (provided that extension
> was previously allowed in some conf file)?
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Extensions can be written in C, to me that seems like enough reason...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2012-03-15 06:40:28 Re: yum repository packages 9.0 and 9.1 libpq conflict
Previous Message Aleksey Tsalolikhin 2012-03-15 05:43:49 Re: A 154 GB table swelled to 527 GB on the Slony slave. How to compact it?