From: | Doug Doole <ddoole(at)salesforce(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cached plans and statement generalization |
Date: | 2017-04-25 22:21:22 |
Message-ID: | CAP6UvaNvFYprWdghZ4=MFUFLczzj1br9CX+vAQFz8wAGd14yug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Plan invalidation was no different than for any SQL statement. DB2 keeps a
list of the objects the statement depends on. If any of the objects changes
in an incompatible way the plan is invalidated and kicked out of the cache.
I suspect what is more interesting is plan lookup. DB2 has something called
the "compilation environment". This is a collection of everything that
impacts how a statement is compiled (SQL path, optimization level, etc.).
Plan lookup is done using both the statement text and the compilation
environment. So, for example, if my path is DOUG, MYTEAM, SYSIBM and your
path is ANDRES, MYTEAM, SYSIBM we will have different compilation
environments. If we both issue "SELECT * FROM T" we'll end up with
different cache entries even if T in both of our statements resolves to
MYTEAM.T. If I execute "SELECT * FROM T", change my SQL path and then
execute "SELECT * FROM T" again, I have a new compilation environment so
the second invocation of the statement will create a new entry in the
cache. The first entry is not kicked out - it will still be there for
re-use if I change my SQL path back to my original value (modulo LRU for
cache memory management of course).
With literal replacement, the cache entry is on the modified statement
text. Given the modified statement text and the compilation environment,
you're guaranteed to get the right plan entry.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:47 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-25 21:11:08 +0000, Doug Doole wrote:
> > When I did this in DB2, I didn't use the parser - it was too expensive. I
> > just tokenized the statement and used some simple rules to bypass the
> > invalid cases. For example, if I saw the tokens "ORDER" and "BY" then I'd
> > disallow replacement replacement until I hit the end of the current
> > subquery or statement.
>
> How did you manage plan invalidation and such?
>
> - Andres
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-04-25 22:24:08 | Re: Cached plans and statement generalization |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-04-25 21:49:31 | Re: Separation walsender & normal backends |