From: | Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.4 release notes |
Date: | 2014-05-06 13:53:54 |
Message-ID: | CAP-rdTa-S6BAnb6zMmqc1kFfZhnMEuM_LKTAaPJ+-8GTR=77rw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-05-05 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:40:29AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> * ALTER SYSTEM SET
>>
>> Lemme know if you need description text for any of the above.
>
> OK, great! Once I have the markup done, I will beef up the descriptions
> if needed and copy the text up to the major items section so we have
> that all ready for beta.
“Add SQL-level command ALTER SYSTEM command [..]”
Using “command” twice sounds weird to my ears. Wouldn’t leaving out
the second instance be better?
Nicolas
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-05-06 14:01:20 | Re: [PATCH] `pg_dump -Fd` doesn't check write return status... |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-05-06 13:49:07 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |