Re: Missing optimization when filters are applied after window functions

From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Volker Grabsch <vog(at)notjusthosting(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing optimization when filters are applied after window functions
Date: 2012-05-17 18:07:41
Message-ID: CAP-rdTY0L34RrekgsEa3sTXKR3hexzoaiJJ=0eWh319+X9x=9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/5/17 Volker Grabsch <vog(at)notjusthosting(dot)com>:

> Also, is there any chance to include a (simple) attempt of
> such an optimiztation into PostgreSQL-9.2 beta, or is this
> only a possible topic for 9.3 and later?

For 9.2, you’re about 4 months late :-). The last commitfest was in Januari:

<URL:https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=13>

Nicolas

--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Berkus 2012-05-17 18:35:14 Re: Why is indexonlyscan so darned slow?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-05-17 16:38:55 Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication