Re: Opinions on SSDs

From: Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs
Date: 2013-08-12 20:15:40
Message-ID: CAP=oouG6ACXGppvh2phYb3YWMpcFdrEHizsst+2Kxq0hXk9ssA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:33:04AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> >1) Has anyone had experience with Intel 520 SSDs? Are they reliable?
>> >When they fail, do they fail nicely (ie, failure detected and bad drive
>> >removed from RAID array) or horribly (data silently corrupted...) ?
>>
>> I don't recall if the 520s have powerloss protection but you will
>> want to check that.
>
> I am pretty sure they don't. The only options are the Intel 320 and
> 710, I think. Here is a blog about it:
>
> http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/intel_ssds_lifetime_and_the_32/
>
> Look for "Enhanced Power Loss Data Protection". Intel does not make it
> easy to find all drive that have it --- you have to look at each spec
> sheet.

The S3700 series also has power loss data protection:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/solid-state-drives-dc-s3700-series.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David F. Skoll 2013-08-12 20:41:48 Re: Opinions on SSDs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-12 20:05:04 Re: Opinions on SSDs