Re: replication behind high lag

From: Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replication behind high lag
Date: 2013-03-25 19:40:11
Message-ID: CAP=oouE8Ds_ouxKZ1p-WSSUN_VNWHiwAycpvDN6rq7fCT9t6OA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:37 PM, AI Rumman <rummandba(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two 9.2 databases running with hot_standby replication. Today when I
> was checking, I found that replication has not been working since Mar 1st.
> There was a large database restored in master on that day and I believe
> after that the lag went higher.
>
> SELECT pg_xlog_location_diff(pg_current_xlog_location(), '0/0') AS offset
>
> 431326108320
>
> SELECT pg_xlog_location_diff(pg_last_xlog_receive_location(), '0/0') AS
> receive, pg_xlog_location_diff(pg_last_xlog_replay_location(), '0/0')
> AS replay
>
> receive | replay
> --------------+--------------
> 245987541312 | 245987534032
> (1 row)
>
> I checked the pg_xlog in both the server. In Slave the last xlog file
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 1 06:02
> 00000001000000390000007F
>
> In Master, the first xlog file is
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Mar 1 04:45
> 00000001000000390000005E
>
>
> Is there any way I could sync the slave in quick process?

generate a new base backup, and seed the slave with it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AI Rumman 2013-03-25 19:43:56 Re: replication behind high lag
Previous Message AI Rumman 2013-03-25 19:37:59 replication behind high lag