| From: | Vedran Krivokuca <vkrivokuca(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Experience with large number of tables in single PostgreSQL instance |
| Date: | 2013-04-10 07:10:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAP+XhHsry4DinX+2eNSdrgD2NLpV8tHpJoC8rDTPQ7gqMYxnWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Vedran Krivokuca <vkrivokuca(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 1) we can go with different instances of PostgreSQL service, let's say
> (for pure theory) 10 of them on the same HA cluster setup. Every
> instance would hold let's say 1/10th of that big recordset, and around
> 3.000 database tables (this apparently shouldn't be of any problem to
> PostgreSQL, see below).
I am talking shit here, obviously, excuse me. We would go with, for
example, 10 or 100 databases in the same PostgreSQL instance.
Buzzwording got better of me. :) The rest of my initial e-mail still
applies, I will cherish any input of experience on this subject.
V.
--
Pozdrav/Greetings,
Vedran Krivokuća
Disclaimer: This message may contain information.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vasilis Ventirozos | 2013-04-10 07:24:50 | Re: Experience with large number of tables in single PostgreSQL instance |
| Previous Message | Vedran Krivokuca | 2013-04-10 07:07:10 | Experience with large number of tables in single PostgreSQL instance |