From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
Date: | 2020-06-02 15:32:10 |
Message-ID: | CAOzAquLKPQPrKTBOu-m2dNeCup7viiGvpJThms7F1ZZ72wi8Hg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I spent about 10 years as an Oracle DBA (back around Oracle 7 and 8) and
the last 20 or so years doing PostgreSQL.
My initial impressions were that Oracle did a better job providing tools
and options that users and DBAs need and PostgreSQL was pretty much
roll-your-own.
Things like being able to copy tables from one database to another or to
restore the dump of a table to another table name in the same database are
things that would make a DBA's life a lot easier.
I worked on a general-purpose web-based tool that could read the PostgreSQL
table structures and provide a form for querying and updating most field
types in a table, but never really took it beyond the persona use basis.
Now that I'm retired, maybe I"ll work on this again.
--
Mike Nolan
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-02 17:17:11 | When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-06-02 14:19:50 | Re: LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe |