Re: The tragedy of SQL

From: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The tragedy of SQL
Date: 2021-09-14 23:25:30
Message-ID: CAOzAquLE35PVi_jipipktAi-aAG9U36wEuVEk-NWL4b3WMfw4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Of all the languages I wrote in, I think SNOBOL was the most fun to write
in, and LISP the least fun. Control Data assembler language
programming was probably the most precise, because you could crash the OS
with a single mis-placed character, something I did more than once.

In a graduate-level course, we studied ALGOL-68, which had so many things
in it that I'm not sure anybody ever actually implemented the full
language. (But then again, has anybody implemented EVERYTHING in the SQL
standard?)

COBOL has strange verbs like 'move corresponding' that could accomplish
complicated tasks in a few lines but you have to be careful that you knew
what you were asking for!

And I'd take the SQL standard over the CODASYL standard any time!
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond Brinzer 2021-09-15 00:31:26 Re: The tragedy of SQL
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-09-14 23:11:45 Re: Roles