Re: undefined symbol when installing pgcrypto on 16.1

From: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: undefined symbol when installing pgcrypto on 16.1
Date: 2024-01-18 20:27:51
Message-ID: CAOzAquL6qSzYtd7VE4FCyZ44H43g5kgU2n9SoX3X7QSZqD3Cdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:51 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Looks like we have aarch64 and ppc64 machines running Alma 8 and 9.
> No x86 though, which might matter for such a low-level failure
> as this.

So I guess that'll be on the list to add to the build farm at some
point? (My Xanthian 'talent' of finding bugs continues, lucky me!)

I get the impression AlmaLinux 9 isn't as widely used as Centos was
yet. (I tend to follow my son's recommendation for which Linux distro
to use, he's an SRE currently at YugaByte, which uses postgresql as a
front end to their custom storage back end.)

Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Bas 2024-01-18 21:32:14 Re: What should I expect when creating many logical replication slots?
Previous Message Martin Ritchie 2024-01-18 19:26:05 Re: Tips on troubleshooting slow DELETE (suspect cascades)