Re: question about age()

From: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question about age()
Date: 2013-08-29 20:19:14
Message-ID: CAOzAquKLh-0tAHgq0+Q1DJz_nPhQPdUWSZxUiUp3JpmscXe3OA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8/29/13, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> wrote:
> is there a bug in age()?
>
> test=*# select *, age(birthday), age (current_date-1, birthday) from
> birthday ;
> id | birthday | age | age
> ----+------------+---------+-------------------------
> 1 | 2010-08-29 | 3 years | 2 years 11 mons 30 days
> (1 row)
>
> Time: 0,322 ms
> test=*# select * from birthday where age(birthday) != age (current_date-1,
> birthday);
> id | birthday
> ----+----------
> (0 rows)
>
> '3 years' != '2 years 11 mons 30 days', but i got 0 rows, why?
>
>
> I'm using 9.2.4.

What is the content of the field 'birthday''? My guess is there's a
null value for the field, in which case you are comparing two nulls.
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-08-29 20:26:32 Re: Is there any method to limit resource usage in PG?
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2013-08-29 19:53:57 Re: question about age()