From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: question about age() |
Date: | 2013-08-29 20:19:14 |
Message-ID: | CAOzAquKLh-0tAHgq0+Q1DJz_nPhQPdUWSZxUiUp3JpmscXe3OA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/29/13, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> wrote:
> is there a bug in age()?
>
> test=*# select *, age(birthday), age (current_date-1, birthday) from
> birthday ;
> id | birthday | age | age
> ----+------------+---------+-------------------------
> 1 | 2010-08-29 | 3 years | 2 years 11 mons 30 days
> (1 row)
>
> Time: 0,322 ms
> test=*# select * from birthday where age(birthday) != age (current_date-1,
> birthday);
> id | birthday
> ----+----------
> (0 rows)
>
> '3 years' != '2 years 11 mons 30 days', but i got 0 rows, why?
>
>
> I'm using 9.2.4.
What is the content of the field 'birthday''? My guess is there's a
null value for the field, in which case you are comparing two nulls.
--
Mike Nolan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-08-29 20:26:32 | Re: Is there any method to limit resource usage in PG? |
Previous Message | Rob Sargent | 2013-08-29 19:53:57 | Re: question about age() |