From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Consistent state for pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2015-05-20 17:44:41 |
Message-ID: | CAOzAquK8=ZwggW0uwBrXxyKkoUiXPX=iJm6RQn4Ms8NEX00zJw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:40 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes. The entire dump is performed within a single transaction.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The documentation for pg_dump says that dump files are created in a
>> consistent state.
>>
>> Is that true across multiple tables in the same pg_dump command?
>> (Obviously it would not be true if I dumped tables using separate pg_dump
>> commands.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Yes. The entire dump is performed within a single transaction.
>
> But if I put the database into a backup state using 'pg_start_backup',
>> would separately executed pg_dump commands be in a consistent state across
>> the set of dump files?)
>>
>>
> pg_start_backup and pg_dump are not designed to work together. Namely,
> pg_start_backup is mostly concerned with making sure future writes are
> accounted for in the final backup while pg_dump says to ignore everything
> that happens after the command begins.
>
> The documentation for pg_dumpall does not say that its dump file is in a
>> consistent state (eg, across all tables), but it does say that it uses
>> pg_dump to dump clusters. So, how consistent are the tables in pg_dumpall
>> files?
>>
>
> Each database is internally consistent. There is no guarantee that
> databases and globals are consistent with each other (though those are
> typically seldom changed) but different databases will to represent the
> same point in time vis-a-vis each other.
>
>
>
> You might want to describe what you are trying to do here.
>
> David J.
>
I'm getting ready for a security audit and I want to make sure I have the
database backup procedures properly documented, including what the
limitations are on each type of backup . We us a combination of low level
backups with log shipping, dumping of key individual tables, dumping of
entire databases and dumping the entire system (pg_dumpall.) Hardware for
setting up a slave server may be in a future budget, though I hope to be
able to test having a slave server in the cloud later this year. (I'm not
sure we have enough network bandwidth for that, hence the test.)
When I moved to a new release of pg (9.3) last December, I stopped all
transaction processing first so that pg_dumpall had no consistency issues.
--
Mike Nolan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Midgley | 2015-05-20 18:11:45 | Fwd: [GENERAL] Does PG support bulk operation in embedded C |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-05-20 16:40:03 | Re: Consistent state for pg_dump and pg_dumpall |