Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2015-06-02 04:35:23
Message-ID: CAOzAqu+H5_c=NEU1zEaNON2r4P=R34kurwnu3a7Axvuet4sn9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Why not take a simpler approach and create a zero length file in
directories that should not be fiddled with by non-experts using a file
name something like "DO.NOT.DELETE.THESE.FILES"?

No, it won't prevent the incredibly stupid from doing incredibly stupid
things, nothing will.
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-06-02 05:21:21 Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-06-02 03:57:58 Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?