| From: | Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Wes Vaske (wvaske)" <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Mel Llaguno <mllaguno(at)coverity(dot)com>, Przemysław Deć <przemyslaw(dot)dec(at)linuxpolska(dot)pl>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some performance testing? |
| Date: | 2015-04-10 13:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzAqu+12AE+oZGfq5+xykaQvUcs3_=tfs2OaS32dfEodtFhAg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Wes Vaske (wvaske) <wvaske(at)micron(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
>
>
> What those graphs are showing is that the new kernel reduces the IO
> required for the same DB load. At least, that’s how we’re supposed to
> interpret it.
>
>
>
> I’d be curious to see a measure of the database load for both of those so
> we can verify that the new kernel does in fact provide better performance.
>
>
>
> *-Wes *
>
>
>
I think you're correct that I mis-interpreted the graph. I hope I was the
only one to do so.
--
Mike Nolan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Graeme B. Bell | 2015-04-10 13:29:38 | Re: Some performance testing? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2015-04-09 21:39:26 | Cannot get query to use btree-gin index when ORDER BY |