Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication

Hello

I've just made the test and now, indeed, i understand the choice and agree
with it.
So basically:

Thx for the push.

Le jeu. 9 janv. 2025 à 13:11, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> a
écrit :

>
>
> On 2025/01/09 9:35, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2024/10/21 18:43, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2024/10/18 23:48, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> >>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
> >>>
> >>> Bug reference: 18663
> >>> Logged by: Asphator
> >>> Email address: asphator(at)gmail(dot)com
> >>> PostgreSQL version: 15.7
> >>> Operating system: RHEL7+
> >>> Description:
> >>>
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> I would like to raise 2 issues:
> >>> - documentation issue
> >>> - pg_stat_replication view issue in a very specific use case
> >>>
> >>> 1. Documentation
> >>> Regarding parameter synchronous_standby_names, I did not manage to find
> >>> anything in documentation preventing from setting value 0. The only
> thing
> >>> I've found is a comment in a commit of 2016. Would be nice to mention
> in
> >>> documentation that value must be a "positive" integer.
> >>
> >> Agreed. I've attached the patch.
> >
> > I made a slight wording adjustment.
> > Unless there are objections, I'll commit the attached patch.
>
> Pushed.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
> Advanced Computing Technology Center
> Research and Development Headquarters
> NTT DATA CORPORATION
>
>

--

____________________
S'instruire pour vaincre...