Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]

From: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]
Date: 2023-11-06 16:32:30
Message-ID: CAOxo6XKdPiVY-MAt2jmD70QQuGsbnngC_OFvqOYU=GmCDkn_Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, thanks for the detailed feedback here.

I do think it's worth addressing the question Stephen raised as far as what
we use for the IV[1]; whether LSN or something else entirely, and if so
what. The choice of LSN here is fairly fundamental to the existing
implementation, so if we decide to do something different some of this
might be moot.

Best,

David

[1]
https://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org/msg154613.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Christensen 2023-11-06 16:37:39 Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-06 16:18:55 Re: Moving forward with TDE [PATCH v3]