From: | David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Error out if SKIP LOCKED and WITH TIES are both specified |
Date: | 2021-08-30 20:55:10 |
Message-ID: | CAOxo6XKFb5P5haRU+rZ1szF0-RDKCQ2kkW3utN1eLaPo3pkHZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 3:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-Aug-13, David Christensen wrote:
>
> > Both bugs #16676[1] and #17141[2] illustrate that the combination of
> > SKIP LOCKED and FETCH FIRST WITH TIES break expectations when it comes
> > to rows returned to other sessions accessing the same row. Since this
> > situation is detectable from the syntax and hard to fix otherwise,
> > forbid for now, with the potential to fix in the future.
>
> I think we should do this, given that it has show potential to bite
> people. We should also add a small mentioned to this in the docs, as in
> the attached.
>
> What do others think?
The patch I included had a doc mention in roughly the same place (at
least the same file), but I'm not tied to the wording I used (and I
may have missed more than one spot that might be appropriate). In any
case, +1.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-08-30 21:05:29 | Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-08-30 20:51:27 | Re: [PATCH] Error out if SKIP LOCKED and WITH TIES are both specified |