From: | Mike Martin <redtux1(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Advice on logging strategy |
Date: | 2018-10-11 11:06:56 |
Message-ID: | CAOwYNKZbPtM1NQJRTdORM=CGbhTNMExQnibYO2vtoeeNs92dyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I suppose the ideal would be to log the prepared statement once and detail
only if error rather than one per execution
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 11:33, Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Mike Martin <redtux1(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I have a question on logging strategy
> >
> > I have loggin set to
> > log_statement = 'all' on a network database with logging set to csv so I
> can import it to a logging table
> >
> > However the database is populated via a nightly routine downloading data
> via REST APIusing prepared statements
> >
> > This results in enormous log files which take ages to import using copy
> becuase each execute statement is logged with the parameters chosen
> >
> > Is there any way around this?
> >
> > I cant find any way to filter dml statements
> >
> > thanks
> >
> Do you want all the log lines in you logging table?
> There was a thread yesterday (10.Oct.2018) on COPY which mention the
> possibility of multiple processes COPYing to same table.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryce Pepper | 2018-10-11 13:33:03 | RE: RHEL 7 (systemd) reboot |
Previous Message | Rob Sargent | 2018-10-11 10:33:41 | Re: Advice on logging strategy |