From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
Date: | 2019-08-05 18:35:38 |
Message-ID: | CAOuzzgrPioEDqYS=iqfxmnD9NNEARGw2K08d83CvTUufZDxi0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 14:29 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > All we need to do to resolve this issue is have Tom commit his patch.
>
> I think Stephen is not being unreasonable to suggest that we need some
> documentation about what external tools may safely do to pg.auto.conf.
I dare say that if we had some documentation around what to expect and how
to deal with it, for our own tools as well as external ones, then maybe we
wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place. Clearly ALTER SYSTEM and
the pg_basebackup modifications had different understands and expectations.
So somebody's got to write that. But I agree that we could go ahead
> with the code patch.
I haven’t looked at the code patch at all, just to be clear. That said, if
you’re comfortable with it and it’s in line with what we document as being
how you handle pg.auto.conf (for ourselves as well as external tools..),
then that’s fine with me.
Thanks,
Stephen
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-08-05 18:38:06 | Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-08-05 18:29:34 | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |