| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replicating DROP commands across servers |
| Date: | 2014-10-15 22:24:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAOuzzgrJA0yNTVd6FkqYs1NO+j4gGykPKKL3BegWUhBeHRSqpw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro,
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > Having reread the patch just now I basically see two things to
> > > criticize:
> > > a) why isn't this accessible at SQL level? That seems easy to address.
> > > b) Arguably some of this could well be done in separate commits.
> >
> > Fair comments. I will split it up.
>
> Here's a split version. The last part is still missing some polish --
> in particular handling for OBJECT_POLICY, and the SQL interface which
> would also allow us to get something in the regression tests.
The OBJECT_POLICY bit is on me to clean up and I'm planning to do so
shortly. I agree that we likely want policies for other objects also as a
couple people have brought up that idea now and will investigate it.
I'm planning to address the copy.c comments first and should have a patch
later tonight.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-10-15 23:59:16 | Re: Column Redaction |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-10-15 22:01:31 | Re: replicating DROP commands across servers |