Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6
Date: 2016-07-19 02:15:24
Message-ID: CAOuzzgqkKpYr_sNbACVKefmfzetqEHVTX+VcO4WM2QW18r3dhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah,

On Monday, July 18, 2016, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com <javascript:;>) wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 12:55:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com <javascript:;>) wrote:
> > > > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update.
> Kindly send
> > > > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your
> subsequent status
> > > > > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > > >
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, not going to make any further progress on this
> tonight or
> > > > over the weekend as I'm going to be out of town. I believe I've
> > > > convinced myself that adding a template1 entry to pg_init_privs will
> be
> > > > both sufficient and produce the correct results, along with adjusting
> > > > the query in pg_dumpall to join through it. Will provide an update
> on
> > > > Monday.
> > >
> > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status
> update. Kindly
> > > send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your
> subsequent
> > > status update. (Your Tuesday posting lacked a date.)
> >
> > Yeah, I realized that tablespaces have the same issue and have updated
> > the patch to address them as well, in the same way.
> >
> > Going through and doing testing now. Unfortunately, it doesn't look
> > like adding in testing of tablespaces into the TAP tests would be very
> > easy (the only TAP test that deals with tablespaces that I found was
> > pg_basebackup and that looks rather grotty..), so I'm not planning to do
> > that, at least not at this time.
> >
> > As such, I'm planning to commit the patch with the fix+regression test
> > for database ACLs and the fix for tablespace ACLs either later today
> > or tomorrow.
>
> Does commit 47f5bb9 fully fix this open item?
>

Yes, it does. Apologies for not closing it.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-07-19 02:28:58 Re: Improving executor performance
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-19 02:11:21 Re: dumping database privileges broken in 9.6