| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl start without --wait |
| Date: | 2017-01-18 21:20:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAOuzzgozL-CWWTSD74-3zyRPJ0dB8Rgb66XDv=qYKhYB6agTyQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 16:15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> > For non-cold standby configurations, pg_ctl is going to return just as
>
> > soon as the database has finished crash recovery, which in most cases
>
> > will probably be on the order of a few seconds.
>
>
>
> /me is poleaxed.
> --------
> Yeah, that was a confused sentence- most of the time it's going to return
> on the order of a few seconds because we're doing regular startup without
> having to do any crash recovery.
> For actual crash recovery cases, it'll take between a few seconds and
> checkpoint_timeout, as I described up-thread, based on the amount of
> outstanding WAL.
> Thanks!
> Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-18 21:34:49 | Re: [PATCH] fix typo in commit a4523c5 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-18 21:15:36 | Re: Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctl start without --wait |