From: | Alexander Kjäll <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | chad(dot)retz(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Maybe time for an alpha release of the pgsql2 project |
Date: | 2018-11-06 19:40:46 |
Message-ID: | CAOuTi9U55Hyy_-ZgTGo2YYgshsP8rf55mj2XQnPL=pZGJ3se4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi
I think I have prepared everything for an alpha release, I also
renamed the library from pgsql2 to pgAdba, could someone who has the
correct access bits go in and rename the github repo from
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgsql2 to https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgadba
also?
I don't really know the normal release procedure for pgjdbc, but I
have prepared so that is someone does "mvn -DskipTests clean install"
all artifacts that should be required to upload to maven central is
produced.
-DskipTests because the tests require that you have a working Docker
environment, plus one of the TLS tests sometimes doesn't manage to
finish before the timeout kicks in.
//Alex
Den tis 30 okt. 2018 kl 10:35 skrev Alexander Kjäll <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> My understanding from reading the jdbc-spec mailing list is that the
> api is work in progress until they are happy with it.
>
> Last updates to the specification was published 2018-10-22 and wasn't
> very large, and there has also been debate on if the fundamental
> return object should be an Future or if it should be a reactive
> stream.
>
> I think there will be more breaking api changes to come, so it's
> important to communicate this to those that are interested in
> experimenting with the library.
>
> //Alex
> Den tis 30 okt. 2018 kl 02:13 skrev Chad Retz <chad(dot)retz(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >
> > Are there any updates on the ADBA abstraction itself? Specifically
> > around stability, test suites, potential inclusion in JRE in some
> > version, active contribution from anyone on the OpenJDK team, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chad
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:38 AM Alexander Kjäll
> > <alexander(dot)kjall(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I'm not totally sure if this is the best place for this topic, but as
> > > the library was briefly discussed on the list before I'll continue
> > > that tradition.
> > >
> > > There is still a lot more work to be done on the adba driver for
> > > postgresql, and the adba specification from oracle is still subject to
> > > change.
> > >
> > > But the driver have also come a long way and is in a state where it
> > > would be useful to be able to experiment with it in external projects,
> > > and therefore I'm feeling that it's time for a first alpha release.
> > >
> > > I have a number of questions regading naming and procedure and stuff like that.
> > >
> > > 1) I feel that the name pgsql2 isn't optimal, maybe change it to pgAdba.
> > >
> > > 2) Do you want to publish the artifact under the org.postgresql
> > > groupId to maven central?
> > >
> > > 3) Any opinion on version numbering? I was thinking that 0.1.0-ALPHA
> > > could be appropriate.
> > >
> > > //Alex
> > >
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2018-11-08 14:14:47 | Re: Maybe time for an alpha release of the pgsql2 project |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2018-11-06 14:30:53 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] f3ade0: Update issue_template.md |