Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX

From: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shayon Mukherjee <shayonj(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX
Date: 2024-09-24 04:37:58
Message-ID: CAOtHd0Akw3hTFDGjRKE793K-nHUEMLLX1s2ZX04iuMGFgQKN=g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

If one of the use cases is soft-dropping indexes, would a GUC approach
still support that? ALTER TABLE?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-09-24 05:08:09 Re: Improve statistics estimation considering GROUP-BY as a 'uniqueiser'
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-24 04:21:45 Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)