| From: | Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | advocating LTS release and feature-train release cycles |
| Date: | 2015-05-31 09:44:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAOsGNSTSM9XbhRfBQFwcZEhY+V5z8WMPnXSEgqehOqu4W2ZuNQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
My comments advocating a (ubuntu/debian/linux-kernel/firefox) LTS
release and feature-train release cycle:
https://lwn.net/Articles/646740/
https://lwn.net/Articles/646743/
The parent article "PostgreSQL: the good, the bad, and the ugly":
https://lwn.net/Articles/645020/
My summary (from one of my comments above):
"For PostgreSQL may be:
- normal release every 3 or 4 months
- LTS release every 12, 18 or 24 months
This model provides:
- higher frequency normal releases to
a) showcase new features to the public and
b) reduce pressure on developers wanting to not miss an "infrequent
annual" release; and
- lower frequency LTS releases to
a) focus testing, stability and long term support resources
b) satisfy "conservative/ enterprise" RDBMS admins
"
Regards,
Zenaan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glen M. Witherington | 2015-05-31 09:50:00 | Re: Efficient sorting the results of a join, without denormalization |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2015-05-31 08:28:23 | Re: replacing jsonb field value |