From: | Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Question about one of the old Autonomous Transaction approach |
Date: | 2017-04-07 01:25:55 |
Message-ID: | CAOoUkxSjq+rveHzoUWo5zgziUGrjGqdt=bsdceouDL7-mCKq=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi All,
Regarding the discussion about Autonomous transaction in below message ID,
long time ago, it has been specified that having a new structure "Struct
PGAutonomousXACT" was rejected in PGCon hackers meeting. Can anyone know
why is it been rejected? What is the disadvantage/problem identified with
that approach?
CA+U5nMKEUm4abRQBndLYt5LEdekTAe8rbiYW3977YHMeOWQ1kA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BU5nMKEUm4abRQBndLYt5LEdekTAe8rbiYW3977YHMeOWQ1kA%40mail.gmail.com>
I tried to look for answers going through various mails related to
Autonomous transaction with no luck. Any answer or hint about where to look
for answers will be helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Vaishnavi,
Fujitsu Australia.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-07 01:41:36 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-04-07 01:17:52 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |