| From: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-05-29 16:03:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAOgcT0NyE=J3XXvoKUAK7vXFHPA5SFhK-Y-bEAGdM91m2VZ1Vg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I have rebased the patch on latest commit with few cosmetic changes.
The patch fix_listdatums_get_qual_for_list_v3.patch [1]
<http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg315490.html>
needs to be applied
before applying this patch.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg315490.html
Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
>
>
>> The existing comment is not valid
>> /*
>> * A null partition key is only acceptable if null-accepting
>> list
>> * partition exists.
>> */
>> as we allow NULL to be stored in default. It should be updated.
>>
>
> Sure Beena, as stated earlier will update this on my next version of patch.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jeevan Ladhe
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| default_partition_v15.patch | application/octet-stream | 42.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-29 16:55:26 | Re: pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-29 16:00:54 | Re: pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against older version of PG data directory |