From: | Prabhjot Sheena <prabhjot(dot)sheena(at)rivalwatch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions |
Date: | 2014-07-07 21:14:50 |
Message-ID: | CAOf_bQbR8nLQ4-yJ9bqw8P980NeVJYVSeK=FTYJctazYr0kuWw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
i will run full vacuum than and see how it goes.
Thanks
avi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes. That's what I was referring to. Back in my 8.3 days, I was required
> to do a FULL vacuum every week. I discussed it quite a bit on this list,
> and there were many people who said it should not have been required, but
> it was, and it resolved my particular issues (clogs not getting removed
> until full vac). I would recommend it.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Prabhjot Sheena
> Date:07/07/2014 3:46 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org,Forums postgresql
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within
> 8439472 transactions
>
> While the vacuumdb --analyze command is running i m getting these messages
> for these tables which might require full vacuum.
>
> WARNING: relation "public.result" contains more than "max_fsm_pages"
> pages with useful free space
> HINT: Consider using VACUUM FULL on this relation or increasing the
> configuration parameter "max_fsm_pages".
>
> WARNING: relation "public.run" contains more than "max_fsm_pages" pages
> with useful free space
>
> HINT: Consider using VACUUM FULL on this relation or increasing the
> configuration parameter "max_fsm_pages".
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Prabhjot Sheena wrote:
>> > Hello
>> > We are using postgresql 8.3 database for last 5 yrs for this
>> > production database and its running fine. This is our critical database
>> > which runs 24*7. This weekend we started getting these messages
>> >
>> > HINT: To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM.
>> > WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions
>>
>> Did you omit the database name here, or is it really an empty string?
>> Make sure you vacuum exactly the database mentioned there. Autovacuum
>> should be doing it, though, but perhaps it's dying for some reason and
>> it can't vacuum one table in particular. You should check your log for
>> errors.
>>
>> --
>> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2014-07-07 22:10:36 | Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions |
Previous Message | Scott Whitney | 2014-07-07 21:05:47 | Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2014-07-07 22:10:36 | Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions |
Previous Message | Scott Whitney | 2014-07-07 21:05:47 | Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions |