Re: Status of FDW pushdowns

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Denis Lussier <denis(dot)lussier(at)openscg(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Date: 2013-11-27 17:35:21
Message-ID: CAOeZVifi1kTQBmmrY76wU9vc4t_iqwmNf+g=xJN537B-reBEaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I guess the view query would have to be validated by the FDW, which
> would just receive a text.

+1

This is not exactly in context, but I and David Fetter discussed
recently how we could do similar thing.

This would work,but how can we do it for FDWs which do not parse SQL?

Am I missing something here?

Regards,

Atri

--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-11-27 17:38:04 Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-11-27 17:34:39 Re: Extension Templates S03E11