| From: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET |
| Date: | 2013-06-26 17:21:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAOeZViejbwTmQ0Qi8HQS8Pfpftk08HxzrqnFa1U1KxWOAys5Fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Isn't it currently the last week of this month? :) I'm guessing you
> mean July.
Heh,no.I lose track of time these days. Alright, second week of July then.
> I really don't see that happening, to be honest.. I think it would be
> interesting to try some of the surrogate-additional-hashing that I
> described.
Yes, I agree to that.
Let me think more and get back on this.
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-06-26 17:51:03 | Re: proposal 9.4 plpgsql: allows access to call stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-06-26 17:19:37 | Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET |