| From: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: anyone using oid2name? |
| Date: | 2014-12-12 14:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAOeZVieB8VoLeojMJh3Jh29q_o3DQvQgqzv+ad8NP1JYXV-weQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday, December 12, 2014, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:18:53AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > pgsql-hackers are discussing some housekeeping in contrib.
> >
> > Is anyone using the oid2name tool?
> >
> > Otherwise, we might deprecate and eventually remove it.
>
> Uh, if we remove it, what tool does someone use from the command-line to
> find the objects represented by files?
>
>
>
+1
Removing a convenience tool without a stable alternative replacement
doesn't seem intuitive.
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
*l'apprenant*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-12-12 14:42:48 | Re: anyone using oid2name? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-12-12 14:25:30 | Re: anyone using oid2name? |