Re: Advice on testing buffer spin lock contention

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Advice on testing buffer spin lock contention
Date: 2013-04-15 17:54:30
Message-ID: CAOeZVico20+zAYx00EfAg2w-G1N65uny2EwG97jRO+7ec3HwUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> You will want a select only workload in which all data fits in
> shared_buffers, and that doesn't do a round trip to some external driver
> program for each row selected.
>
> I proposed a patch for pgbench to add a new transaction of this nature last
> year under the subject "pgbench--new transaction type". Heikki also
> described how you can make a custom pgbench -f file to accomplish the same
> thing without having to change and recompile pgbench.
>
>
> There was also a length discussion about nailing certain pages so they don't
> need to get pinned and unpinned all the time, under "9.2beta1, parallel
> queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the
> oprofile"
>

Thanks a ton, we will try it out.

Regards,

Atri

--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-04-15 19:30:51 Re: INDEX Performance Issue
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2013-04-15 06:09:24 Advice on testing buffer spin lock contention