Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Ben Zeev, Lior" <lior(dot)ben-zeev(at)hp(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Date: 2013-05-27 12:23:42
Message-ID: CAOeZVicmso7dxWu3p--apZLT_-_RaWyyv3wdZ7gdiM34KeWPzw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> A better place to look would be the documentation for the release of PG
> which you are on, or the latest release otherwise, which is:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/storage.html

Oops,yes,sorry about that.

Thanks a ton for pointing that out.

Regards,

Atri

--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-05-27 12:26:48 Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-05-27 12:21:12 Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture