Re: looking for old rpm

From: Etienne Champetier <champetier(dot)etienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: looking for old rpm
Date: 2015-09-21 16:24:23
Message-ID: CAOdf3gq4mkb_-fko_kPeWi4dZDdzDKuc8WsO+=fvgQ6rLHqXeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

2015-09-21 17:46 GMT+02:00 John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>:

> On 9/21/2015 12:31 AM, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for old postgres rpm, like
>> postgresql93-server-9.3.6-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> (one of our software is "certified" with this minor version ...)
>>
>
> I cringe when I see requirements like this. did they also 'certify'
> this applicaiton to only run on whatever was the day's snapshot build of
> the OS, such that any newer security updates and bug fixes can't be applied
> to RHEL 6 ?
>

Yes they do :), they certify centos 6.5 stock, without updates \o/
We are going to update, just when we call the support we will have to prove
that it's there app that is buggy, not all the (minor) updates ...

Having old rpm can also be useful to build new dev env in sync with
production env (when you update slowly)

>
> specific to 9.3.6, you'd be missing out on the fixes ...
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-3-7.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-3-8.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-9-3-9.html
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-09-21 17:21:02 Re: Memory for BYTEA returned by C function is not released until connection is dropped
Previous Message John McKown 2015-09-21 16:07:33 Re: looking for old rpm