Re: Index on integer or on string field

From: Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index on integer or on string field
Date: 2015-05-15 15:26:58
Message-ID: CAO_YK0WJB7hpvAbN9rXSFYOUDMiWRzs3ZNS60QyO29YdhLbHoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You should probably experiment with a btree-gin index on those.
Em 15/05/2015 12:22, "Job" <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it> escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> i have a table of about 10 millions of records, with the index on a string
> field.
> Actually is alphabetical; since queries are about 100/200 per seconds, i
> was looking for a better way to improve performance and reduce workload.
>
> The unique values, of that fields, are about the 50 (category name), and
> we could create a second table to codify, with numerical integer values,
> the 50 recurring names.
>
> Is index are integer and not characteral, performance are better and
> workload reduces?
>
> Is there any comparisons?
>
> Thank you!
> Francesco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Job 2015-05-15 15:34:00 R: Index on integer or on string field
Previous Message Job 2015-05-15 15:18:30 Index on integer or on string field