From: | Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index on integer or on string field |
Date: | 2015-05-15 15:26:58 |
Message-ID: | CAO_YK0WJB7hpvAbN9rXSFYOUDMiWRzs3ZNS60QyO29YdhLbHoQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
You should probably experiment with a btree-gin index on those.
Em 15/05/2015 12:22, "Job" <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it> escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> i have a table of about 10 millions of records, with the index on a string
> field.
> Actually is alphabetical; since queries are about 100/200 per seconds, i
> was looking for a better way to improve performance and reduce workload.
>
> The unique values, of that fields, are about the 50 (category name), and
> we could create a second table to codify, with numerical integer values,
> the 50 recurring names.
>
> Is index are integer and not characteral, performance are better and
> workload reduces?
>
> Is there any comparisons?
>
> Thank you!
> Francesco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Job | 2015-05-15 15:34:00 | R: Index on integer or on string field |
Previous Message | Job | 2015-05-15 15:18:30 | Index on integer or on string field |