Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Date: 2024-08-20 17:46:30
Message-ID: CAOYmi+ncccLudXrCJ_S5fYQsU+D3=HZqxu3uAj+GJYO=Oct05g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:42 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Semantic versioning guidelines are not something we are following, especially here.

I understand; the protocol is ours, and we'll do whatever we do in the
end. I'm claiming that we can choose to provide semantics, and if we
do, those semantics will help people who are not here on the list to
defend their use cases.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-08-20 17:55:46 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-08-20 17:42:15 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs